The primary purpose of antipyretics is not to reduce fever, but to make the child more comfortable during the "battle."
I still remember when my baby had a fever for the first time; the whole household was in a state of panic. The number on the thermometer, like a tightly drawn string, tugged at the hearts of every family member. 38.5°C! My first reaction was: I must bring the temperature down immediately! At that time, I believed that reducing the fever equated to restoring health.

So, I frantically searched for the fever-reducing medicine, carefully calculated the dosage based on weight, and administered it. Then, I began taking the temperature every ten minutes, anxiously watching the mercury column and silently pleading: Go down, go down! But after half an hour, the temperature had only dropped from 38.5°C to 38°C, still far from the "normal temperature" I was hoping for. I panicked immediately, wondering if the medicine was ineffective. Should I increase the dose? Or try a different medication? My mind was consumed with how to get that number back to 37°C.
I believe many parents have experienced the same anxiety. We are so afraid that the fever will "harm" our child that we see the temperature reading as the sole enemy, feeling we must "defeat" it.

Later, during a hospital visit with my child, I had a detailed conversation with a doctor and realized how mistaken I had been. The doctor was very patient and used an analogy that suddenly made everything clear. He said: "A fever is like the set temperature of your home's air conditioner being turned up. The child's body is 'fighting a battle'; raising the temperature creates an environment less favorable for viruses and bacteria to grow. It's the body's defense system working hard. When you give fever-reducing medicine, you're not turning off the air conditioner; you're temporarily lowering that excessively high setting to make the child more comfortable. Your goal should be to help the child feel better, rest well, and drink some fluids, not to force the thermometer down to 'zero.'"
These words completely changed my perspective. I had been focusing all my attention in the wrong place. I was only concerned about "the child on the thermometer" and had overlooked "the actual child."
I began to learn and change. The next time my child had a fever, I tried to suppress my panic and stopped taking his temperature so frequently. I went to his side, sat down, and observed him carefully. I felt his hands and feet—were they burning hot or warm? I checked his mental state—was he listless and only wanting to lie down, or did he have a little energy to look at a picture book? I tried offering him water—did he push it away in refusal, or was he willing to take a few sips?

I noticed that some time after taking the fever-reducing medicine, even though the thermometer still showed 38°C, his previously furrowed brow had relaxed, his breathing had become steady and even, and he even drank a large cup of water before curling up in my arms and falling asleep. At that moment, I suddenly understood what the doctor meant by "comfort." The medication was working; it had achieved its purpose—my child felt more comfortable and could rest. Whether his temperature was 38°C or 37°C truly didn't matter as much.
Through trial and error, I've also made mistakes and heard many unreliable suggestions. Elderly family members often said, "Bundle them up, make them sweat, and they'll get better." I actually tried this once, and the child cried even more intensely, his little face flushed red. When I took his temperature, it was even higher. I later learned that young children have a weaker ability to regulate body temperature. Bundling them up tightly prevents heat from dissipating, which is like "adding fuel to the fire" of a fever and can be very dangerous.
There's also the advice of rubbing the body with alcohol, which some say cools quickly. But did you know? A child's skin is particularly thin, and alcohol can be easily absorbed, potentially causing poisoning. Moreover, the chilly stimulation from rubbing can make the child shiver, actually generating more heat. These "folk remedies" often mean well but do more harm than good.

I've also, in a moment of panic, considered whether giving "anti-inflammatory drugs" (antibiotics) would speed up recovery. But the doctor told me that most childhood fevers are caused by viruses, and antibiotics are completely ineffective against them. Misuse can disrupt the good bacteria in the child's gut, and if a bacterial infection occurs later, the antibiotics might be less effective.
Ultimately, we have only two safe "weapons" at our disposal: acetaminophen and ibuprofen. When using them, it is absolutely essential to calculate the dosage based on the child's weight, not age. The small measuring cup or dropper that comes with the bottle is the most accurate "ruler"—never use a random spoon. Also, be patient. After giving the medicine, allow the body 30 to 40 minutes to respond. Don't be like my past self, jumping with anxiety if the fever hasn't dropped within ten minutes.
Of course, parents shouldn't be too complacent either. While a fever is the body's "signal fire," some signals are urgent distress calls that require immediate medical attention. For example, if a baby under three months old has a fever, go to the hospital immediately—no debate. If the child is delirious from fever and cannot be awakened, or is breathing very rapidly with a poor complexion, or is vomiting and having diarrhea to the point of being unable to drink fluids and producing almost no urine—in these situations, stop observing and stop administering medication. Hurry to the hospital and let professionals make the judgment.
After going through these experiences, my mindset has become much calmer. Now, when my child has a fever again, I feel more assured. I settle him in a well-ventilated, comfortable room, dress him in thin, sweat-absorbing cotton underwear, and cover him with a light blanket. A cup of warm water is always by the bedside, and I encourage him from time to time, "Sweetie, let's have a drink of water." I prepare light, soft, and easily digestible meals. If he doesn't want to eat, I don't force-feed him. Sometimes, I use a small towel slightly cooler than warm water to gently wipe his forehead, neck, and calves. If he finds it comfortable and doesn't resist, I continue; if he squirms and seems unhappy, I stop and simply hold him.

My eyes no longer fixate solely on the thermometer; they are now on my child. A yawn from him, a peaceful swallow, a relaxed turn in his sleep—these bring me more reassurance than a drop of a few tenths of a degree on the thermometer. I understand that my child is fighting germs in his own way. What I can do is not to overstep and give misguided commands (like blindly reducing fever), but to be a considerate "logistics chief," providing support so he can be more comfortable while fighting this battle.
So, if you are also feeling helpless about a child with a fever, I want to share this insight with you: Please believe that fever-reducing medicine is an aid to make the child comfortable, not a tool to "reset" the body temperature to zero. Let go of the obsession with the number, and take a careful look at the little one in your arms. Is he more relaxed than before taking the medicine? This is the true "gold standard" for deciding whether to use medication and whether it is effective. Being a parent is a journey of cultivation. What we need to learn is not only knowledge but also how to let go of anxiety, using a calm mind and a warm embrace to accompany our children through those uncomfortable moments.